Category Archives: Politics

Joe Hathaway Positions Himself as Pro-Israel Candidate

By Yasmin Abrar

Republican Joe Hathaway, a candidate for New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District, gave a press conference for student journalists at the Princeton Summer Journal on July 29. As the former mayor of Randolph, New Jersey and a political science major at Yale University, Hathaway highlighted issues of affordability and safety as the core of his policies. 

His opponent, Congresswoman Analilia Mejia, was elected in April during a special election. Her policies mainly consist of increasing the minimum wage, universal healthcare and the abolishment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 

Hathaway, who prides himself on being a moderate Republican, previously blasted Mejia on social media for being a “far-left activist.” One topic where he and Mejia differ the most is on Israel and its actions in Palestine, which the United Nations has determined to be a genocide.

Mejia has been critical of Israel and has stated that it is committing war crimes in Gaza, while Hathaway has continuously supported Israel as an ally of the U.S. and told the Princeton Summer Journal that “Israel’s our lone Western ally in the Middle East.”

When asked about balancing Israel’s security within the Middle East and humanitarian concerns in Gaza, Hathaway said, “We can support our allies, we can make sure that they have the tools they need to protect themselves and defend themselves…. We can ensure that humanitarian aid flows, and we can make sure that Israel is able and has the right to defend itself.”

Hathaway explained that the district he is seeking to represent has a large Jewish population; he connected with them after the Hamas attack in 2023, when he was on the Randolph town council.

“There’s nothing that kind of prepares you for something like that, when you’re at the local level,” he said. “I remember very distinctly going over to one of the local synagogues in town, October 9th or 10th, maybe. And just being with the families there. And a lot of folks had families over in Israel that were missing or they weren’t sure,” Hathaway said.

That experience influenced his support for Israel, he explained.

“It’s my job to be here and to be with this community and to be supportive of them, staying with them.”

Joe Hathaway Promises to Maintain Moderate Stance

By Trinity Falayi

As the MAGA movement becomes dominant in the Republican party, the status quo is to champion Donald Trump’s policies. In one New Jersey district, there’s a moderate Republican candidate willing to stand against his own party. But how far will he go? Can Joe Hathaway maintain his moderate stance? Or is it just a matter of time before he falls in line? 

Hathaway, a Yale graduate and Mayor of Randolph, New Jersey, is running for office in the state’s 11th Congressional district, with just three months left before voters cast their ballots in November. In his race against Democrat Analilia Mejia, Hathaway’s main campaign promise is to increase affordability for New Jersey residents. 

“You can’t afford to buy a house anymore in New Jersey,” said Hathaway in a press conference with the Princeton Summer Journal. “I believe the government needs to make things work smarter and more practical… I think we have an opportunity to do that in this race.” 

When pressed on his willingness to go against the Republican party, Hathaway pointed out that he’s done it before.

“I have a track record of voting against my all-Republican council at the local level when I believe it’s the wrong thing for our constituents,” he said.

Hathaway also opposed President Donald Trump’s attacks on the Gateway Program, which would increase rail capacity between New Jersey and New York. 

“There’ve been plenty of times where I’ve said, ‘This isn’t right for my district,’ and I oppose it,” Hathaway said. “I think one of the biggest examples was the Gateway Tunnel funding… I was one of the first Republicans in Jersey that really pushed back strongly on that.” 

Addressing concerns about data centers, which CBS News reports could increase electricity bills by up to 20 percent, Hathaway emphasized the affordability of alternative energy sources.

“We have to increase our capability when it comes to nuclear [energy]… That’s going to bring down costs immediately,” he said.

Hathaway says his focus on affordability outweighs his total loyalty to the Republican Party, a position that may appeal to voters in his majority-Democratic district. 

“If I come back to NJ-11 and talk about how I was willing to buck my party and buck the president because it wasn’t good for voters here in NJ-11… [The] district is one that has enough voters on all sides of the aisle, where that message will be rewarded,” he said. 

Candidate Joe Hathaway Promises Affordability, Defends ICE

By Roxanna Rozehee

Republican congressional candidate Joe Hathaway, running in New Jersey’s 11th District, discussed his campaign promises during a press conference with Princeton Summer Journal student journalists on Wednesday. He promised affordability and a practical ideological approach for the district.

Councilman Hathaway is the former mayor of Randolph, New Jersey. He opened the conference with a reflection on his career of over fifteen years in corporate communications and stressed the importance of individuality.

He shared a personal anecdote of experiencing imposter syndrome while attending Yale University, reassuring students not to contrast themselves with others. “Don’t compare yourself to the people around you,” he said. “Compare yourself to yourself, to the best version of yourself.”

Shifting the conversation to the campaign, Hathaway noted that the race has entered a pivotal stage, remarking that Election day is now 100 days away. He argued that voters had sufficient time to evaluate the record of current Democratic Representative Analilia Mejia and contrasted his platform with her initiatives.

Hathaway described himself as a “common sense, practical, independent-minded Republican, someone who served at the local level, knows how government works, [and] also knows how it could work a whole lot better for New Jersey especially.” 

He focused on decreasing the cost of living and throughout the press conference, he repeatedly remarked that affordability is the defining issue facing New Jersey residents, pointing to rising housing prices, education costs and energy bills.

Among his economic proposals, Hathaway stressed decreasing taxes, increasing vocational education, and strengthening domestic manufacturing. Rather than relying on increasing the minimum wage, he believes the government should foster opportunities that allow workers to earn higher-paying careers through increased skills and workforce development.

Hathaway elaborated on his energy policy. He argued that increasing nuclear energy should be central to meeting future electricity demands, specifically as artificial intelligence increases the need for data centers. While acknowledging public concerns regarding new facilities, he stated that properly planned data centers are necessary for maintaining American leadership in AI and that increased energy production would lead to decreased utility costs for New Jersey residents.

Hathaway defended U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement while simultaneously advocating for increased oversight through body cameras and improved equipment. He criticized New Jersey’s sanctuary policies, however he supported immigration reform that would provide long-term undocumented immigrants with a pathway to permanent legal status.

Addressing the district’s Democratic majority, Hathaway said his campaign aims to attract moderate voters exasperated with political extremism. “People are tired of extremism across the board. You look to the left, you look to the right, there’s too much extremism. There is only one candidate in this race who’s willing to come to the middle. It’s me, and that’s a message we’re getting down, and I think what we do will be successful.”

Candidate Joe Hathaway Characterizes Opponent As Extremist

By Greyson McMillian

Joe Hathaway is a self-proclaimed community-focused Republican candidate who is running for Congress in the November midterms after his loss during a special election just over three months ago to Democrat Analilia Mejia — who assumed office in April.

Speaking about his campaign to high school journalists for the Princeton Summer Journal, Hathaway stated that while he and Mejia ran on similar campaign issues — lowering high costs and raising low opportunities — his opponent’s candidacy has focused instead on “ideology, hyperpartisanship, extremism and more of what we’ve come to see as the furthest extremes of her side of the aisle.” 

Further characterizing his opponent as an extremist and someone who does not deliver on her campaign promises, Hathaway criticized Mejia’s vote against the Stop Insider Trading Act and the absence of a vote on the Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act. “And that’s just what she’s done in Washington,” he said, followed by the claim that Mejia was “sparking more riots and chaos” during protests this spring at Delaney Hall, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Newark.

Mejia was invited but unable to attend the Princeton Summer Journal press conference.

Not only did Hathaway heavily criticize Mejia, but he also used these characterizations as a foil for his own campaign, which he claimed was “a path of a new generation of common sense, of practicality, of track record and of government that works well for people at the local level.”

When asked about how he’d sway a majorly Democratic district to vote for him, he said that “people are tired of just extremism across the board. If you look to the left, you look to the right, there’s too much extremism.” 

Hathaway said that he — and not his opponent — was the counter to such extremism. “There is only one candidate in this race who’s willing to come to the middle. It’s me,” he said.

Hathaway also highlighted what he said was a lack of experience on Mejia’s part by contrasting his own surplus of expertise: “I think what our district sees is a choice between someone who’s running on ideology and someone running on practicality, right? Who served as a mayor, who served as a councilman, who has ideas that actually get to the heart of what the main challenges are for us in New Jersey.”

Republican Candidate Joe Hathaway on ICE

By Aryana Berhane

During a press conference on July 29, Republican Congressional candidate Joe Hathaway addressed his stance on issues including foreign affairs, socialism and his relationship with president Donald Trump. He also explained his position on ICE and law enforcement. 

Hathaway is running in New Jersey’s 11th congressional district. Earlier in the year, during a special election, Hathaway lost to his challenger Analilia Mejia, who has called for ICE to be abolished and replaced. They are now meeting again for another face-off in the midterm election in November.

Under Trump, there has been a significant increase in deportations of immigrants in communities across the country. In January, meanwhile, citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement in Minneapolis, Minnesota during Operation Metro Surge. Protests have broken out all over the country in response to the deportations and arrests of people. 

Hathaway expressed his support for ICE. “ICE has an important job to do. The vast majority of people in our country and in our state want safe communities. They want people who are committing crimes, to not commit crimes. They want them to be held accountable, and if they’re here illegally, they want them to be removed.” 

Hathaway added, though, that he believes there should be reforms to ICE. “Things like better training, or better equipment, better technology, body-worn cameras, things like that. We should absolutely be bringing those things to the table, so they can do the job of keeping our community safe,” he said. 

When asked about protections for protestors who are being injured at demonstrations, Hathaway stated that New Jersey sanctuary policies — which allow immigrants to report crimes without fearing their immigration status — prohibit local law enforcement from having contact with federal law enforcement. 

“Those laws do more to keep people less safe than they do to keep anybody safe… if we had federal officers able to communicate with local officers, [so] some local officers could know when, where, and how they were going about… making arrests or being in the community, they could do their job and help keep the community safe.”  

Question: Is Single-Issue Voting the Right Way to Go?

By Therese Agbetiafa and Jorge Rodriguez

Certain identities come with certain social advantages. Not just small everyday privileges, but deeper ones that determine the risks people face when political decisions are made. The impact of a decision like the reversal of Roe v. Wade or the launch of a mass deportation campaign can depend on a person’s demographic. 

Single-issue voting is when a voter casts a ballot for a politician based on their feelings on one particular political issue or idea. For some, a single issue does not define their way of voting, while others reject partisan loyalty. 

In interviews with nearly a dozen people in Princeton, New Jersey, it became clear that a voter’s identity heavily influences their voting behavior, and their incentive to be a single-issue voter. 

“My background belies what people would think my voting ways are,” said Jordan Denning, a white man. “There are many elections where I do not like anybody running. So I don’t touch it… [I] just do my own thing.” Denning’s voting decisions reflect how he doesn’t always feel personally engaged in politics. 

Carolyn Galayda and Becca Goldman feel that as members of the LGBTQ community, their rights are particularly vulnerable. The couple votes with one goal in mind: Whichever candidate represents the underrepresented wins their vote.  

“We do look a lot at the opinions of the League of Women’s Voters… We’re gay, so we also have a lot of concern about that issue,” Goldman said. She and Galaya favor candidates who consider the rights of vulnerable voters in most, if not all, contexts. 

“So often I feel like I’m voting to not have the bad choice… I don’t want to lose my vote,” Goldman said. 

The sense of obligation to vote for the “lesser evil” was widespread amongst interviewees. 

Zain Shahabuddih, 26, brought a new perspective to the conversation, one of a young person who feels their impact is limited. Like Denning, Shahabuddih is not always motivated to vote. Not necessarily because he isn’t a vulnerable voter, but because he’s demotivated by the candidates. 

“If I were to vote, I would like to vote for one who was the lesser evil,” he said. “I [have] kind of been disenchanted with a lot of options.” 

Shahabuddih is not a single-issue voter by definition; in fact, he’s barely a voter at all. “I vote when it makes an impact,” he says. But he acknowledged that his background influences his values and how he votes. Shahabuddih may not vote in every election, but when he chooses to vote, he votes for candidates he believes can uplift his community. 

Ultimately, the question isn’t whether or not single-issue voting is the right way to go, but whether U.S. voters can unite across identity lines.

Single-Issue Voting Misses the Mark

By Ximena Garcia and Max Rosenthal

Candidates run on multi-policy platforms, but “single-issue” voters cast their ballots for one. In Princeton, New Jersey, most voters base their decisions on the issues that affect them and their community the most.

“I think that, with the world, there are so many issues that we need to focus on that it’s really hard to narrow down a candidate on their single issue platforms,” said Gwynne Frischmann, 55, of Newtown, Pennsylvania. 

Even so, as a mother who works alongside young women, Frischmann acknowledged that female-centered issues influence her vote.

“It’s hard not to get caught up on platforms of abortion and just all the rights that are being taken away from women, especially young women in today’s world,” Frischmann said, but she feels that single-issue voting misses the bigger picture. 

“You have to step back and see what is best for the majority of people in the world, in your life, and your communities,” she said.

Kylie Gibson, 16, cares about other issues but will vote on what affects her the most: the economy. “Yeah, I mean it’s selfish, but [other issues] wouldn’t be my problem. I care more about my money,” she said.

The general consensus was that single-issue voting is ineffective in upholding democracy, but community members were conflicted about whether the problem is the single-issue ballot or the influence that sways it.  

Valrya Vega, 28, from Mexico City, feels that single-issue voting has failed to promote democracy because of bribery in her country. The Mexican government faced backlash after they unveiled new “scholarship” cards in 2021 that provided 1.2 million preschool, elementary, and high school kids with up to $24 a month for meals and supplies. These “Claudia Cards” resulted in accusations that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has used welfare programs to illegally gain votes and get ahead of future presidential opponents. 

“It’s like selling their votes for a little bit for scholarships,” said Vega. “They’re given money so [politicians] can buy their votes. So that’s a really bad issue.”

When it comes to deciding how to vote, interviewees said that political conversations don’t change the issues they vote on. But for Frischmann, discussing politics with her community is a way to share more about the issues she cares about. 

“I don’t think [these conversations] have impacted my issues,” she said. “It’s just changed how you can either be open or not open about discussing what’s important to you as an individual.”

With midterm elections around the corner, single-issue voting on abortion, the economy, and corruption is not going away. The question is: Will it sway the balance of power this fall? 

One Person, One Vote

By Aryana Berhand and Joslyn King

How much of one’s personal values can be sacrificed for the sake of their country? In today’s political climate, many voters find themselves having to choose between the lesser of two evils. 

According to U.S. News & World Report, New Jersey is one of the most politically engaged states in the country. This is doubly true of Princeton, New Jersey, where residents spoke candidly about the influence of their values on their voting habits.

Several Princetonians rejected the philosophy of single-issue voting, keeping in mind the myriad of issues that affect not only our country, but the rest of the world, too.

“If the candidate’s gonna be in office, then their decisions will affect everything,” said Emma Cichone. “So you have to look at everything.”

This belief is held even among those who are not yet eligible to vote. “I’d have to look at the person’s values, not necessarily just their opinion on that one issue,” said Maddie Fowler, a local high school student. 

However, there is some recognition that single-issue voting is a prevalent practice in current times. Andrew Guo, who does not single-issue vote, believes that it is important to understand others’ views, especially in politics. He approached the conversation with empathy, understanding that voting can be difficult. 

“I think ideally you would judge a candidate’s worth based off of what he believes on all sorts of issues, not just one issue,” he said. Still, Guo could see why some people might gravitate towards single-issue voting. 

During the 2024 presidential election, the conflict between Palestine and Israel divided voters, though both candidates held pro-Israel ideals. Some people felt so strongly about this issue that they chose not to vote at all. 

For many Princetonians, voting is an important part of the civic responsibility they feel at the local and national level. While some people look at candidates holistically, others vote on the specific issues that are important to them. 

Whatever the case may be, one vote comes down to one person’s values. Sometimes, it comes down to one of those values alone.

One Vote is Rarely About One Thing

By Aeryn Bautista and Yeisbel Peña

Sixty-six percent of Americans say they’re worried about global warming, according to Yale’s Program on Climate Change Communication. Forty-two percent believe that we’re heading toward a total economic collapse, a YouGov survey found.

For single-issue voters, just one of these concerns can determine their vote. 

Single-issue voting, or the practice of voting for a candidate based on their position on a single issue, has always been a part of American politics. According to some Princeton area residents, that approach is not the path to progress.

“I think you’re selling yourself short if you would vote on a single issue, right?” said Steven A., 31. In his opinion, single-issue voters are “basic.” 

Interviewees from Kingston, NJ, who voted in 2012 were happy to vote for Obama purely based on his handling of unemployment in the aftermath of the Great Recession. Nothing else felt nearly as pressing for them. Today, the same voters describe a more complicated, yet necessary, calculation involving abortion, war, immigration and all else that President Trump’s administration brought to the forefront of American politics. 

Robert Schmidt, 19, voted for Harris in 2024. “I just didn’t like Trump and any of his ideas,” he said. “I didn’t agree with a lot of what Kamala Harris was saying, but I just didn’t agree with Trump as a whole.”

Decades ago, voters relied on print media, speeches and debates for candidate information. Now, they can track aspiring officials’ every word on every policy through short-form content on Instagram, X and TikTok. 

Young people, in particular, find themselves worrying about all aspects of a candidate’s platform that social media draws into the limelight. Many identify themselves completely with positions raised by the left side of the aisle, highlighting how daily political content encourages polarization. 

Reese Eigenbauer, 14, expressed this sentiment in simple terms. “I just don’t really like Trump and what he stands for, and what he was planning on doing when he got into office,” she said.

Residents unfamiliar with the term “single-issue voting” rejected the label immediately once it was explained. 

“Absolutely not,” said Claudine Collins. Her support for Harris, she added, rested on “every reason under the sun.” 

If there was ever a time when a single issue decided an election, the people of Princeton suggest that it is long gone. 

“Life’s a lot more complicated than that,” said Steven A. “Society’s a lot more complicated than that. So why make your vote cast on a single issue?”

“We Cannot Protect People From It,” Says Mayor Freda on ICE 

By Grace S.

On June 30, Princeton Mayor Mark Freda attended a press conference with the Princeton Summer Journal, where he discussed recent United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity in the small New Jersey town. 

“Our police do not work with ICE. We do not support ICE in immigration matters in any way, shape, or form,” he said, expressing his dislike for the federal organization.

“It seems to me that ICE is concentrating on anybody that appears to be Latino. That is their A-number-one target, and so that’s problematic,” Freda said. Of the 15 people taken, he said he was “90-some-percent” sure that at least one had work authorization. “They’re going to work,” he said. “None of them are criminals.” 

Freda went on to discuss what his administration is doing to aid the detainees. One option is for the town to support the proposed New Jersey Immigrant Trust Act, which would protect immigrants and their personal information. The act has faced both pushback and support. 

“The Immigration Trust Act is something the state legislature will hopefully act on at some point,” Freda said. “People are concerned that if we pass the resolution in support of the act, that somehow, ICE and others will pay more attention to Princeton.” 

Freda faced pressure surrounding the legislation at a recent town council meeting. “We had probably about 60 or 70 people show up and were giving us a really hard time,” he said. Freda maintained that the act is a state matter and he is still undecided if he will support it. 

Despite immigration issues being out of his hands on a federal level, Freda still wants to support his constituents, as hard as that may be. 

“Why are we bothering these people? We cannot protect people from it. We just can’t,” he said. “It doesn’t matter. What resolution we pass doesn’t matter. We can’t. Until [things change] at the federal level, all we can do is offer help.”